Wednesday, 16 June 2010 07:38

A disturbing report circulating today by the Kremlin and was prepared for Prime Minister Putin from Sagalevich Anatoly Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of Russia warns that the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico has been broken "beyond repair" and our planet must start prepare for an ecological disaster. "Beyond all comprehension" unless it be taken "extraordinary measures."

The most important thing to note about the warning Sagalevich is that he and his fellow scientists of the Russian Academy of Sciences is the only human beings who have been at the site of oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico after being called to the scene the disaster by the British oil giant, British Petroleum shortly after the collapse of the Deepwater Horizon platform on 22 April.

Sagalevich According to the report, the oil spill into the Gulf of Mexico is not well, leaving only the 22 "showing Americans on television, but at least another 18 sites on the" fractured seafloor "being the largest 11 kilometers (seven miles) from where it sank the Deepwater Horizon and is throwing up these precious bubbling water with about 2 million gallons of oil per day.

It is interesting to observe Sagalevich on this report stating that he and other Russian scientists were required by the United States to sign documents prohibiting them report their findings to any means either American or foreign, and that they had to do to operate legally in U.S. waters.

However, Sagalevich says he and other scientists gave updates almost hourly as the U.S. government as BP officials about what they were seeing on the seabed, including U.S. Senator from Florida, Bill Nelson that after such information to the news network said MSNBC "Andrea're seeing something new right now, that there are reports that oil is seeping up from the seabed ... which would indicate, if this were true, that the well casing is in perforated right below the seabed. So, you know, could be enormous problems with which we are facing. "

Although not directly stated in the report Sagalevich, the findings of Russian scientists about the true state of tanker disaster in the Gulf of Mexico are, beyond doubt, be filtered to their longtime friend, Matthew Simmons who was the advisor main energy of former President George W. Bush, whom the U.S. media reports say openly: "Matthew Simmons is sticking to his story that there is another huge spill in the Gulf of Mexico pumping tremendous amounts of oil into the Gulf. In "Fast Money" on CNBC, said he would be surprised if BP could happen this summer, saying that this whole mess is the fault of BP. "

As a prominent person within the oil industry and one of the foremost experts in the world oil peak, Simmons, also notes that the United States have only one option left to dry well (it would take 30 years and ruin the Atlantic Ocean) or nuclear detonations. "


The Obama, on the other hand, has indicated that it is discussing the nuclear option to end this catastrophe, which puts him in conflict with Russian and American experts who advocate this extreme measure before all is lost and as reported by British newspaper The Telegraph:



"The former Soviet Union (USSR) used nuclear weapons on five separate occasions between 1966 and 1981 to successfully shut down oil and gas wells in the area (there was one attempt that failed) and was documented by an Energy Department report U.S. on peaceful uses of nuclear explosions USSR.

Russia is now urging the United States to consider doing the same. The Komsomoloskaya Pravda, the Russian top-selling newspaper, said that although based on the Soviet experience, there is one chance in five that the well could not seal, is "a bet that Americans would have to risk."

It is said that the USSR developed special nuclear devices to close the gas wells using the theory that the explosion of a nuclear detonation would plug any well in a range of 25-30 meters, depending on the power of the device. As much as I imagined in my spare time, massive explosions can be used to bring down a well on the run, covering well, or at least substantially contain the flow of oil.

"The seabed nuclear detonation is starting to sound surprisingly feasible and appropriate" is the quote that said reports Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas, Michael E. Webber while visiting researcher on nuclear policy and former naval officer Christopher Brownfield wrote in the Daily Beast. "I would have this well with explosives demolished a month ago. And yet we see with unbearable suspense while BP is clumsily using and scrap the plan after plan to restore its oil and cover your property. "

As to the reason for Obama to refuse to consider this well set off by nuclear means, Sagalevich noted in this report that the "primary concern" of the United States is not the environmental disaster that is causing this disaster, but rather the impact that the use of a nuclear weapon to stop this spill would have on the continued production of oil from the Gulf of Mexico and in an energy hungry world remains the only oil-producing region of the planet capable of increasing production.

Above the environmental catastrophe that is happening in the Gulf of Mexico, the situation could worsen as new U.S. reports grim predictions are confirmed as Russian scientists concerning poisons dispersion of oil they are using the BP and are being collected into the clouds and falls as rain destroying toxic to all living plants that touches and as detailed in our May 23 piece entitled "The Oil Spill Toxic Rain Could Destroy North America."